Static tool counts are useful until the product changes. After that, they become debt. The stronger position is not ‘we have X tools’ but ‘the site exposes the right workflows for the current configuration and key.’
Why counts fail
Counts age the moment a feature is added, removed, or reclassified.
That creates a mismatch between marketing and reality, and buyers notice.
What buyers actually want
They want to know if the product can handle content, Elementor, SEO, media, menus, forms, and multi-site operations.
That is a workflow question, not a vanity metric.
How MCPWP frames it
Capabilities are discovered from the live site and the scoped key, which means the product can present what is actually available.
That creates a much more credible commercial message.
Takeaway
Use dynamic capability language, not fixed counts, when the product is evolving.
The story stays honest and the sales message stays durable.